|
مقاله
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Title:
|
Comparison of Posterior Corneal Elevation and Thinnest Pachymetry Measured with Two Optical Tomography Systems
|
Author(s):
|
Noroozizadeh Mohammad Hafez MD, Dadbin Nooshin MSc. Optometrist.
|
Presentation Type:
|
Poster
|
Subject:
|
Cornea and Anterior Segment
|
Others:
|
|
Presenting Author:
|
|
Name:
|
Mohammad hafez Noroozizadeh
|
Affiliation :(optional)
|
Negah Eye Hospital
|
E mail:
|
hnoroozi2002@yahoo.com
|
Phone:
|
00982188886147
|
Mobile:
|
00989121094906
|
|
|
Purpose:
|
To evaluate thinnest pachymetry and posterior corneal elevation measurements between Orbscan-II slit scanning and Galilei double Scheimpflug devices.
|
Methods:
|
Seventy eyes of 35 consecutive LASEK candidates simultaneously examined with Orbscan-II and Galilei for parameters of posterior corneal elevation and thinnest pachymetry. All patients operated and at least one month after surgery, above parameters measured again with these two systems.
|
Results:
|
Mean age of patients was 29.66 years, (20-44 years). Twenty two patients were female and 13 were male.
Mean preoperative thinnest pachymetry measured by Orbscan-II and Galilei were 540.04 µm±40.46 (SD) and 547.54 µm ±32.14 (SD) respectively. Mean preoperative posterior elevation measured by Orbscan-II and Galilei were 6.825±0.2745 and 6.329±2.2245 respectively.
Mean postoperative thinnest pachymetry were 458.58 µm±44.54 (SD) and 481.03 µm ±45.88 (SD) respectively. Mean postoperative posterior elevation measured were 6.99±0.04 and 7.25±0.45 respectively. A significant difference was noted between two devices in thinnest pachymetry measurements pre and post-operatively (P<0.0001), but there was no pre and post-operative statistically significant difference in posterior elevation between these two devices (P=0.085 and P=0.58 respectively).
|
Conclusion:
|
Thinnest pachymetry measurements obtained by Orbscan-II and the Galilei cannot be used interchangeably pre and post-operatively. However, Orbscan-II and the Galilei measurements can be used interchangeably with posterior elevation measurements.
|
Attachment:
|
5973.pptx
|
|